NEW RESEARCH79% of shoppers say the same chain is noticeably better or worse store to store.Get the full report, free →

New research: why the same chain wins in one store and leaks in another.Get the report →

Causal inference analytics for multi-site retail

Find out what your stores are capable of selling.

Your current reports show what your stores sold, and traditional benchmarking ranks them against each other. We compare each store with its twin to show what it should be selling, which of the initiatives running there at the same time are driving sales, and which are costing you margin.

The big chains build digital twins with cameras and sensors. Seurat builds a twin of every store from the sales data you already have.

Where your own history can't answer the question, we bring the answer key from chains like yours that have already made the change.

Two stores your reports get wrong
  • A store on a busy corner can beat its peer benchmark every month while running a mediocre operation, because the location is doing the work.
  • Another store can slip 1% in the year a competitor opens nearby. Every standard metric calls that a decline. We call it the best-run site in the chain, because its twin, facing the same new competitor, lost 10%.

Both stores are illustrations.

HEARTLAND MARKETSLever BoardReads updated weekly
Store #217Maple & 9th, Cedar Rapids · fuel + kitchen + 2 EV chargersMeasured at 14 stores like this one. Ranked in order of opportunity for Store #217.
Store index · 0–100 · measured at 14 stores like this oneSignature item sales31Foodservice38Pump → store conversion44Attachment rate52Basket vs. chain avg58
On the board at #217$154K/yr10 levers fit this store
Recommended to start now5 leversworth $95K/yr, no capex
Read maturingWeek 3 of 8: Eliminate loyalty clutter · verdict lands in ~5 weeks
Validated at #217$4.1K/yrCold vault reset (planogram): measured $4.1K vs. the $3.4–5.1K estimate. Inside the range ✓
Ranked by value delivered × confidence. All dollar figures are incremental inside sales, not gross profit. Reads draw on stores like this one plus transported findings from beyond the chain, and each row cites the source of each finding.
#LeverWhere it's provenWorth at this storeConf.Status
1Make the signature item identical, every visitStore-to-store drift is your #1 repeat-visit riskMeasured16 matched-store readsFieldShanghai store walksSurveyn=1,200 consumers$31Kper yearAStart now
2Cut the menu to what you're great atFewer items, tighter execution, faster lineMeasured9 matched-store readsFieldFarmingdale store walk$26Kper yearBStart now
3Two-Strike winback after a second bad visitHalf the shoppers who quit a store were gone within 2 bad visitsPOS12 chains, second-miss patternSurveyn=1,200 consumers$19Kper yearBStart now
4Keep serving the entire menu until closeLate-night crowds come specifically for pizza and friesFieldWarsaw · Kraków, 2am queues3 matched-store reads under way$17Kper yearBQueued
5Eliminate loyalty clutterPump screens + door posters run four competing offers todayMeasured11 matched-store reads$14Kper yearALive at #217wk 3 of 8 · verdict in ~5 weeks
Ruled out for #217 — measured elsewhere, doesn't pay here
—Go 24 hours at this locationWorks in nightlife zones. Maple & 9th goes quiet at 11.Measured13 stores that tried it$0skip it — save the laborARuled out
Built for your world
What we sell
For vendors who sell into stores
Proof
2026 NACS MemberConexxus Member

The Mid-Market Retail Intelligence Briefing

Subscribe for first access to the Causal Convenience Index, our latest consumer research, and new reads as the boards update. Free, monthly.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

See past briefings →